This article starts you on the path of developing your "Project Program". There is a companion worksheet that can be found in the article index that will assist you in documenting what you learn in this article.
New Home Design - The Very Beginning
Successfully designing a home requires a synthesis of:
- personal vision
- needs and desires, and
- constraints
Everything you do while designing your home involves
integrating, balancing and compromising among these three parameters.
Personal Vision
This is your “big idea”. It can be aesthetic or emotional
and should be general. For example, I recently had a client whose vision was
“To design their final retirement home that reflects a contemporary
style, takes advantage of their view and easily accommodates their
children and grandchildren”. A spec builder’s vision might be “A
house with a craftsman style with some unique design elements and all
the typical amenities needed for it to sell for $750,000”. A much
less interesting vision, but a valid starting point. This is very much
like an organization’s mission statement. Architects talk about
this as part of the “Project Program”.
When considering your own vision statement imagine all the
different ways you think of home. Is home a quite retreat for
relaxation and contemplation? Is home a place for entertaining
friends and guests? Is home a place for raising a large family
through all the cycles of family growth? Is home a place to last
two or three years while your family is young? What are the things
you think of fondly that you’d like to implement? Jot this stuff
down on a piece of paper as you consider what you value.
Next consider the elements of style you’d like to emulate.
Is your preferred style craftsman, contemporary, Italianate? Are you
imagining a little bungalow or a house that reflects a regional flavor?
Do environmental conditions dictate some of the style such as a ski
chalet? This can even take a negative form. I have a client
that couldn’t articulate a preferred style but knew for sure what they
didn’t want.
If you already have a site are there specific conditions of the
site that inform your vision? Perhaps there is a view you want to
maximize. Perhaps a beautiful tree or trees that you want to
preserve. Perhaps part of your vision involves developing urban
wildlife habitat. Think of things associated with your site that
might drive what you want to accomplish.
Once you’ve considered these things you probably have a list.
The list may be good enough but you might consider distilling that list
into a sentence or two. This will be the place you start and will
be a tool to use to evaluate your success as the design process unfolds.
Periodically through the process ask your self if the design to date
reflects your vision. If the design isn’t accomplishing your
vision it’s time to stop and realign the design.
Needs & Desires
This is a really big topic and in future articles we’ll have
more to say about it in detail. In summary however this is a list
of the specifics you want in the house. This makes up another part
of what architects call the “Project Program”.
House Size
How big do you want the house to be? This is a parameter
that is partially affected by constraints that we’ll discuss in a future
article, such as lot size or construction budget. However it can
be a useful starting place. Most people have some idea of how big
they’d like their new home to be, if for no other reason than they can
compare it to the homes they’ve lived in in the past. Generally this is
a very rough number and it actually becomes the sum of all of the room
sizes.
Living Style
What’s the “living style” of the home? Is it a traditional house with formal and informal living spaces separated from each other? Such a house might have a formal living room and a formal dining room that wouldn’t be directly open to the informal living spaces such as the kitchen, daily eating area and family room. The informal spaces would be used every day and the formal spaces would only be used for guests or special occasions. An example of such a floor plan can be seen in figure 1.
Figure 1
Perhaps you prefer a more informal and
“open plan” type of home. In this case the great room would be the
primary living area and would be open to and include an open kitchen, a
breakfast nook or other eating area and room for more than one social
activity at a time. Figure 2 shows an example of this.
Another option is a hybrid of the two. Often our clients will
employ the great room concept but will also include a formal dining
room. In this case the dining room may still be immediately
adjacent to the great room as seen in figure 3.
Figure 2
-
Figure 3
What rooms do you need?
What rooms are absolutely necessary in the house?
Answering the “living style” question shakes out some of that.
You’re still left to decide how many bedrooms you need, how many
bathrooms and what other auxiliary rooms are necessary. Do you
need a den or office? What kind of storage do you need? Are other
rooms such as studios or children’s play areas needed?
Next you consider what rooms are not absolutely necessary but
that you would still like to have if they can fit within the other
controlling constraints. In other words, which rooms are
negotiable? Negotiable rooms might be sewing or craft rooms, mud
rooms, additional guest rooms, additional closet or storage spaces.
When considering rooms don’t forget outdoor spaces. A
great deal of the livability of the house comes from how you use your
outdoor space. Out door space can be as simple as a typical deck
off the great room. It might be a covered section adjacent to the
kitchen large enough to accommodate a barbecue or it might be a full
blown covered room with an out door fireplace and space to eat or lounge
and still be out of the weather. We’ll discuss outdoor spaces in
grater detail in future articles.
Now identify the preferred sizes of the rooms. An example
could be, “The kids bedrooms should be 12’x12’ or roughly 150 square
feet each”. This is your wish list. If every room in your
house met these criteria you’d be ecstatic. This is the target that will
be used when doing the initial layout.
How big are these rooms?
Next identify the minimum room sizes you are willing to live
with. An example could be “all bedrooms must have a minimum
dimension of 10’ x12’”. In this step identify the minimum
dimensions of each of these rooms. Some rooms might not have a
minimum dimension, but most of them should. This will be the
non-negotiable fall back position as you lay out the rooms.
It’s also helpful to have an idea of the maximum room sizes you
want. Sometimes the best solution to a given design problem might
result in some rooms being larger than your ideal. Knowing how big
is too big can be a useful analytical tool.
How many levels?
The final consideration for this stage of the project program
is deciding on the number of levels in the house. Is the house a
single story “rambler” or do you see it as a multi-story home.
Often the site constraints inform or drive this decision, but it’s a
good idea to know what you want.
This is just the beginning stage of the project program.
In later articles we’ll consider it room by room and make more specific
decisions about what the rooms contain, how they’re configured and what
their relationships to each other are.
Constraints
Constraints has 2 fundamental components: budget and physical.
The budgetary constraints are obvious and affect some projects more than
others. The physical constraints have to do with what is possible
to actually build on the parcel of land you’ve selected. While
we’re at it, we’ll assume the laws of physics as constraints as well.
Budget
There are many different ways to ameliorate and manipulate this
constraint. We’ll touch on those in detail in a future article.
At this point we’ll keep it simpler than it actually is. For most
people their principal budgetary issue is how much of a mortgage they
can afford, or how much of a mortgage are they willing to pay. So
we’ll work backwards from there. For the time being we’ll assume
that you have $750,000 to work with which we’ll call your total budget.
The Known Knowns
The purpose for the budget we are developing is to be able to
guide design decisions about the house itself, we’ll call this the
design budget. Therefore we’ll need to subtract from that total
budget all costs not directly related to the design of the home.
First subtract the soft costs. That would be all costs associated
with the transaction of the land purchase and loans. This should
include any costs associated with the construction loan. It’s not
unusual for this to be 20% of the total cost of the project. Some
people use the term “soft cost” to refer to things like appliances,
floor coverings etc, this is not how I’m using the term. Next
subtract the cost of the lot and any known assessments. This is
especially the case if these costs are large and known. If you
have a $20,000 sewer assessment fee that is paid at the time of permit
issuance, here’s the place to subtract it from the budget.
The Known Unknowns
Here you have things like consulting fees (architect, engineer
etc), and permit fees. Next subtract all costs related to
developing the lot. That would include the cost of clearing and
grading, costs of demolition, fees associated with utility hook ups,
septic system design and installation. You should also include
something here for unanticipated site costs such as poor soil conditions
or problems caused by bad weather. Also include general liability
insurance.
What’s left?
What’s left is what you have to spend to pay a contractor to
build your house. This should include their profit, overhead and
any sales tax. Don’t forget about the sales tax! I’ve seen
budgets discussed many times and then had them change because sales tax
was not included in the estimating. So if everything above cost
half of the total budget you have a design budget of $375,000 to build
the house. In 2008 dollars you should anticipate that it will cost
between $100 and $200 per square foot to build a home. The
difference between these two numbers is complexity and quality. If
you anticipate a budget of $100 per square foot then the design should
be very simple and the finishes and fixtures selected should be
inexpensive. If you anticipate a complex design with high quality
finishes then expect less square footage for your design budget.
Lately I’ve been suggesting that clients plan on $135 per square foot.
Of course in 2008-2009 there are some real bargains out there and you
can probably get more for less. At that price you can get a 2800
square foot house that is 2 or more levels and has a 2 car garage.
Site Constraints
The constraints that a site can place on your design vary widely.
A flat 5 acre parcel that has been fallow pasture land may have no real
constraints at all. You can put the house any where you want
(within setback limits) and perhaps any old design that meets the
program will work. On the other hand if you have a 4000 square
foot steeply sloping lot in
In later articles we’ll discuss in detail siting issues using
real world examples but for the time being we’ll talk in generalities
and assume a typical suburban or in-city infill lot.
Zoning
The first set of constraints you’ll face are regulatory, that
is the zoning (or land use) code’s rules for developing lots in your
zone. These generally take the form of restrictions on setbacks
from property lines, limitations on height and lot coverage, parking
location restrictions and sometimes limitations on impervious areas.
Some municipalities have unique regulations you won’t see anywhere else.
The City of
ECA
Environmentally sensitive areas such as steep slopes or
wetlands (even in the vicinity although not on your property) impose
their own set of restrictions on where or what you can build. I
recently designed a home on a 4 acre site that had exactly 1700 square
feet of buildable lot area once the sensitive areas were delineated.
These sensitive areas have different names in different municipalities.
In
Access
The next controlling issue is vehicular access. One way
or another you want to put those cars in a garage, so the house has to
be designed so that a car can get into the garage. On a flat lot
it’s easy; on a sloping lot it has more of an influence on the finished
design. An alley gives you additional alternatives and
flexibility.
Sloping Lots

Sloping lots pose their own challenges. You will often see folks who found the perfect plan for a flat lot try to force it on to a sloping lot rendering it at best ugly. When a lot slopes side to side, consider placing the driveway on the low side. If it slopes downward or upward from the street the fun really begins. I recently designed an addition to a house that put the garage up high near the street with a breezeway down to the existing house. The home shown in this photograph had the benefit of being on a corner. In this case we designed the house so that the garage access was on the lower street and the main entry was on the upper.
Aesthetic Considerations
Another set of site constraints are aesthetic. Is there a view you want to take advantage of? How does the direction of that view relate to the street and which rooms should face the view? Perhaps on smaller lots there are privacy issues. Perhaps the neighboring property is unsightly and you don’t want to have to look at it. Perhaps your street is busy and you want to minimize its impact. All of these things go into deciding how to lay the house out on the lot
Conclusion
By now you’re at the beginning stage of knowing everything you
need to know to design your home. You have a framework for
proceeding with the next step of identifying the details of your program
and design. You have your vision of the home, you’ve developed a
list of your needs and desires, you have a sense of your budget and thus
roughly how much house you can afford. You’ve examined your lot
and determined how its particular characteristics will shape the design.
The next step is to flesh out and add detail to that framework.











